Hurt v. Soros
This text of 520 F. App'x 229 (Hurt v. Soros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) actions as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Soros, No. 8:12-cv-03402-RWT (D.Md. Nov. 30, 2012); Hurt v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-03278-PJM (D.Md. Nov. 28, 2012); Hurt v. New York, No. 8:12-cv-03281-PJM (D.Md. Nov. 27, 2012); Hurt v. Nio Nazi’s, No. 8:12-cv-03282-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 28, 2012); Hurt v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-03637-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 21, 2012); Hurt v. U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Nos. 8:12-cv-03643-JFM, 8:12-cv-03647-JFM, 8:12-cv-03646-JFM, 8:12-cv-03644-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 21, 2012); Hurt v. King, No. 8:12-cv-03675-AW (D.Md. Dec. 26, 2012). The motions for appointment of counsel and to amend the notice of appeal are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 F. App'x 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-soros-ca4-2013.