Hurt v. Moore

19 Tex. 269
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Tex. 269 (Hurt v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurt v. Moore, 19 Tex. 269 (Tex. 1857).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The judgment enforcing the lien does not contain any intelligible description of the land ; nor does it contain any reference to any matter of record, or other matter, accessible to the Sheriff, by which he may ascertain upon what land he is to levy the execution. If he were to attempt its execution according to the directions which the plaintiff might give, he would incur a risk to which it would be unreasonable to subject him. The description of the land ought to be such that the Sheriff may ascertain with certainty, without relying on the plaintiff for information, upon what he is to levy the execution. And for the want of it, the judgment enforcing the lien must be reversed. The petition contains no more certain description of the land than the judgment. But as the [271]*271plaintiff was not called upon by any exception to amend in that particular, lie ought to have the opportunity to do so, afforded ; and to that end the cause will be remanded. As there is no error in the judgment upon the money demand, it will be in so far affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Townsend v. Ratcliff
50 Tex. 148 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Tex. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-moore-tex-1857.