Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
This text of Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2212
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; MARY SURRALT; SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-2213
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE; GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States; U.S. SENATE; U.S. CONGRESS; THE COUNTRY OF IRAN,
No. 08-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant, v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 08-2216
No. 08-2218
GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States; U.S. CONGRESS; U.S. SENATE; THE COUNTRY OF IRAN; ALL NEWS MEDIA OF THIS NATION, U.S.A.,
2 No. 08-2226
DEDLEY AND SINGLETARY, INCORPORATED; COATES AND LANE, INCORPORATED; WOODLEY HOUSE, INCORPORATED; U.S. VS. NICHOLS; HURT VS. USDC DC NAT.,
No. 08-2227
CLINTON; U.S.D.C. FOR THE D.C.; U.S.C.A. FOR THE D.C. CIR; FALUN GONG PRACTITIONERS OF CHINA,
No. 08-2228
3 v.
JIM CROW; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00808-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00915-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00916-LMB- JFA; 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv- 00944-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: March 13, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
4 PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing these actions as frivolous or for failure to state a
claim. We have reviewed the records and find that the appeals
are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Eighth Amendment;
Hurt v. The American People; Hurt v. United States; Hurt v.
United States; Hurt v. Bush; Hurt v. Dedley and Singletary,
Inc.; Hurt v. Clinton; Hurt v. Jim Crow, Nos. 1:08-cv-00808-LMB-
TCB; 1:08-cv-00913-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00914-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-
00915-LMB-TCB; 1:08-cv-00916-LMB-JFA; 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA;
1:08-cv-00918-LMB-TRJ; 1:08-cv-00944-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed
Sept. 9, 2008, entered Sept. 11, 2008; Sept. 12, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hurt v. Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-eighth-amendment-to-the-us-constitution-ca4-2009.