Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transportation

Fourth Circuit

Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transportation

667 F. App'x 791

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2016·No. No. 16-1376·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transp., No. 5:15-cv-00468-F, 2016 WL 1032811 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transp., No. 5:15-cv-00468-F, 2016 WL 1032811 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transportation, 667 F. App'x 791 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 791 (Hurt v. D.C. Metro Transit Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related