Hurt v. Country of Germany

647 F. App'x 256
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2016·No. Nos. 15-2414, 15-2415, 15-2416, 15-2418, 15-2419, 15-2420, 15-2423, 15-2427, 15-2428, 15-2429, 15-2430, 15-2431, 15-2433, 15-2434, 15-2435, 15-2436, 15-2439, 15-2441, 15-2443, 15-2444, 15-2447, 15-2449, 15-2450, 15-2451, 15-2452, 15-2453, 15-2454, 15-2495·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 2012. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Germany, No. 5:15-cv-00308-H; Hurt v. U.S. House of Representatives, No. 5: 15-cv-00321-H; Hurt v. Maryland, No. 5:15-cv-00323-H; Hurt v. N.C. Transit, No. 5:15-cv-00327-H; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5:15-cv-00329-H, 5:15-cv-00331-H; Hurt v. Chief of Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-cv-00332-H; Hurt v. Nevada, No. 5:15-cv-00333-H; Hurt v. D.C. Gov’t, No. 5:15-cv-00338-H; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5: 15-cv-00340-H, 5:15-cv-00410-H; Hurt v. Senator Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00417-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00462-H; Hurt v. Nat’l Div. of Am. Indian, No. 5:15-cv-00463-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00466-H; Hurt v. Mississippi, No. 5:15-cv-00467-H; Hurt v. U.R.S., No. 5:15-cv-00471-H; Hurt v. South Carolina, No. 5:15-cv-00472-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00473-H; Hurt v. Organizing for Action, No. 5:15-cv-00483-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00498-H; Hurt v. United States Senate, No. 5:15-cv-00499-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00500-H; Hurt v. Senator Ron Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00517-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00530-H; Hurt v. Former President of U.S., No. 5:15-cv-00532-H; Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, No. 5: 15-cv-00545-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00497-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2015; Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurt v. Country of Germany, 647 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2016).

647 F. App'x 256 (Hurt v. Country of Germany) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)