Hurt v. Country of Germany

Fourth Circuit

Hurt v. Country of Germany

647 F. App'x 256

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 2016

DocketNos. 15-2414, 15-2415, 15-2416, 15-2418, 15-2419, 15-2420, 15-2423, 15-2427, 15-2428, 15-2429, 15-2430, 15-2431, 15-2433, 15-2434, 15-2435, 15-2436, 15-2439, 15-2441, 15-2443, 15-2444, 15-2447, 15-2449, 15-2450, 15-2451, 15-2452, 15-2453, 15-2454, 15-2495

StatusPublished

This text of 647 F. App'x 256 (Hurt v. Country of Germany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurt v. Country of Germany, 647 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 2012. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Germany, No. 5:15-cv-00308-H; Hurt v. U.S. House of Representatives, No. 5: 15-cv-00321-H; Hurt v. Maryland, No. 5:15-cv-00323-H; Hurt v. N.C. Transit, No. 5:15-cv-00327-H; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5:15-cv-00329-H, 5:15-cv-00331-H; Hurt v. Chief of Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-cv-00332-H; Hurt v. Nevada, No. 5:15-cv-00333-H; Hurt v. D.C. Gov’t, No. 5:15-cv-00338-H; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5: 15-cv-00340-H, 5:15-cv-00410-H; Hurt v. Senator Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00417-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00462-H; Hurt v. Nat’l Div. of Am. Indian, No. 5:15-cv-00463-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00466-H; Hurt v. Mississippi, No. 5:15-cv-00467-H; Hurt v. U.R.S., No. 5:15-cv-00471-H; Hurt v. South Carolina, No. 5:15-cv-00472-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00473-H; Hurt v. Organizing for Action, No. 5:15-cv-00483-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00498-H; Hurt v. United States Senate, No. 5:15-cv-00499-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00500-H; Hurt v. Senator Ron Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00517-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00530-H; Hurt v. Former President of U.S., No. 5:15-cv-00532-H; Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, No. 5: 15-cv-00545-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00497-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2015; Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 2012. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Germany, No. 5:15-cv-00308-H; Hurt v. U.S. House of Representatives, No. 5: 15-cv-00321-H; Hurt v. Maryland, No. 5:15-cv-00323-H; Hurt v. N.C. Transit, No. 5:15-cv-00327-H; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5:15-cv-00329-H, 5:15-cv-00331-H; Hurt v. Chief of Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-cv-00332-H; Hurt v. Nevada, No. 5:15-cv-00333-H; Hurt v. D.C. Gov’t, No. 5:15-cv-00338-H; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5: 15-cv-00340-H, 5:15-cv-00410-H; Hurt v. Senator Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00417-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00462-H; Hurt v. Nat’l Div. of Am. Indian, No. 5:15-cv-00463-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00466-H; Hurt v. Mississippi, No. 5:15-cv-00467-H; Hurt v. U.R.S., No. 5:15-cv-00471-H; Hurt v. South Carolina, No. 5:15-cv-00472-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00473-H; Hurt v. Organizing for Action, No. 5:15-cv-00483-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00498-H; Hurt v. United States Senate, No. 5:15-cv-00499-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00500-H; Hurt v. Senator Ron Johnson, No. 5:15-cv-00517-H; Hurt v. United States, No. 5:15-cv-00530-H; Hurt v. Former President of U.S., No. 5:15-cv-00532-H; Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, No. 5: 15-cv-00545-H; Hurt v. Int’l Crim. Ct., No. 5:15-cv-00497-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2015; Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

647 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-country-of-germany-ca4-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack