Hurt v. Baltimore Maryland

633 F. App'x 159
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2325
StatusPublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 159 (Hurt v. Baltimore Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurt v. Baltimore Maryland, 633 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and conclude that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Baltimore, Md., Chief of Police, No. 5:15-cv-00320-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-baltimore-maryland-ca4-2016.