Hurst v. Stone
6 Ky. Op. 129, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 455
Opinion
Opinion by
Mrs. Hurst did not hold the lot mortgaged to appellees as separate estate, although the title was conveyed to a trustee. It being general estate, she had the power in conjunction with her husband to bind it by mortgage, to secure the payment of the husband’s debt. Sharp’s Adm’r v. Proctor’s Adm’r and Heirs, 5 Bush 396.
The court below did not e.rr in enforcing the mortgage, and the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurst v. Stone, 6 Ky. Op. 129, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 455 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).
6 Ky. Op. 129 (Hurst v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sharp's adm'r v. Proctor's adm'r
68 Ky. 396 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1869)