Hurst v. State

327 S.W.3d 634, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1769, 2010 WL 5287276

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James E. Hurst appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing in which he sought to vacate his convictions on two counts of criminal non-support. He claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims that his guilty plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel by the public defender’s office. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).