Hurst v. State
111 S.E. 738, 28 Ga. App. 471, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 615
This text of 111 S.E. 738 (Hurst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurst v. State, 111 S.E. 738, 28 Ga. App. 471, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 615 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, when the charge of the court is considered in its entirety and as adjusted to the evidence, is without merit.
There is some evidence to authorize the verdict, and, the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial. .
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 738, 28 Ga. App. 471, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-state-gactapp-1922.