Hurst v. State

88 S.E. 930, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 223
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 930 (Hurst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurst v. State, 88 S.E. 930, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 223 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Where a bill of exceptions in a criminal case recites that it is presented “within thirty days from the date of said order overruling said motion for new trial,” and the certificate to the bill of exceptions is signed more than twenty days after such date, and it does not affirmatively appear from either the record or the bill of exceptions that the latter was tendered within twenty days from the date of such judgment, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such writ of error. Evans v. State, 112 Ga. 763 (38 S. E. 78); Harris v. State, 117 Ga. 13 (43 S. E. 419) ; Glawson v. State, 140 Ga. 14 (78 S. E. 188).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McIntosh v. State
36 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Durrell v. White
31 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Dodd v. State
177 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
King v. State
149 S.E. 650 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 930, 145 Ga. 164, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-state-ga-1916.