Hurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hurst v. State

691 So. 2d 648, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4000, 1997 WL 186467

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1997

DocketNo. 95-04426

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 691 So. 2d 648 (Hurst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurst v. State, 691 So. 2d 648, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4000, 1997 WL 186467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

Mr. Hurst challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, having reserved the right to appeal that denial when he pleaded no contest to the charge of possession of cocaine. He also challenges Condition (18) of his probation because it was not orally imposed.

We affirm on the suppression issue but strike Condition (18) of Mr. Hurst’s probation. The State offers no objection to the striking of the probation condition, without remand.

We strike probation Condition (18) and otherwise affirm.

WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI