Hurst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hurst v. State

448 So. 2d 1250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 27, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1778

StatusPublished

This text of 448 So. 2d 1250 (Hurst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurst v. State, 448 So. 2d 1250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellant has too many concurrent convictions to enumerate. We affirm the judgments of conviction against the appellant but remand for correction of appellant’s written sentences to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement as to the sentences running concurrently with “any active sentence being served.” See Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellant has too many concurrent convictions to enumerate. We affirm the judgments of conviction against the appellant but remand for correction of appellant’s written sentences to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement as to the sentences running concurrently with “any active sentence being served.” See Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 So. 2d 1250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack