Hurst v. Rudder-Adams Mill Co.

51 So. 519, 164 Ala. 504, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 289
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 16, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 So. 519 (Hurst v. Rudder-Adams Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurst v. Rudder-Adams Mill Co., 51 So. 519, 164 Ala. 504, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 289 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

McCLELLAN J.

Action by appellee against appellants to enforce lien for materials furnished in construction of a building. The appeal is on the record alone. The judgment is valid on its face. It shows that the parties were before the court at the time the judgment was rendered. The argument of counsel for appellant seems to be that error infected the proceeding because of the asserted failure to take a jury’s verdict on the question, whether there was a debt due the plaintiff for mate[505]*505rials furnished, and, if so, how much, and whether the plaintiff had a lien therefor.

Section 4770 of the Code contemplates a trial of these issues by the court without a jury, or by a jury. The record (there is no bill) does not negative a tvaiver of a submission of the issues to the jury. To sustain the' judgment we will presume, if necessary, that the right to a jury trial was waived. The judgment is affirmed on the errors assigned and argued here.

Affirmed.

Anderson, Sayre, and Evans, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cumens v. Garrett
319 So. 2d 665 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 So. 519, 164 Ala. 504, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-rudder-adams-mill-co-ala-1909.