Hurst v. Rodney

12 F. Cas. 1044, 1 Wash. C. C. 375
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The defendant is bound by the covenant to pay the rent, in the first deed to Perkins, which runs with the land, so long as it is retained by the defendant. Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurst v. Rodney, 12 F. Cas. 1044, 1 Wash. C. C. 375 (circtdpa 1806).

12 F. Cas. 1044 (Hurst v. Rodney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. Witherbee
9 L.R.A. 561 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Brooks v. Smith
1 Thompson 226 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1860)