Hurst v. McCall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hurst v. McCall

161 S.E. 152, 44 Ga. App. 251, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 655

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1931

Docket21737

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 152 (Hurst v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurst v. McCall, 161 S.E. 152, 44 Ga. App. 251, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 655 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The issues of fact in this case were determined by the verdict of a jury, supported by ample legal evidence. Such a verdict will not be disturbed by this court. The charge to the jury simply and clearly stated the law applicable to the facts. None of the assignments of error can be sustained. The judgment of the superior court in the premises is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The issues of fact in this case were determined by the verdict of a jury, supported by ample legal evidence. Such a verdict will not be disturbed by this court. The charge to the jury simply and clearly stated the law applicable to the facts. None of the assignments of error can be sustained. The judgment of the superior court in the premises is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.E. 152, 44 Ga. App. 251, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-mccall-gactapp-1931.