Hurst v. Ker
12 F. Cas. 1038, 1 Wash. C. C. 189
This text of 12 F. Cas. 1038 (Hurst v. Ker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurst v. Ker, 12 F. Cas. 1038, 1 Wash. C. C. 189 (circtdpa 1804).
Opinion
I am satisfied with this answer. I did not know that such was the practice here. I was misled by the Virginia practice, where it is the clerk’s duty to put down the causes on the trial docket, as soon as they are at issue. But if only the plaintiff can do this, unless hastened by a proviso rule, we ought surely to grant it' Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 F. Cas. 1038, 1 Wash. C. C. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-ker-circtdpa-1804.