Hurst v. Hurst

Nebraska Supreme Court

Hurst v. Hurst

445 N.W.2d 889, 233 Neb. 426, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 394

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1989

DocketNo. 87-1064

StatusPublished

This text of 445 N.W.2d 889 (Hurst v. Hurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurst v. Hurst, 445 N.W.2d 889, 233 Neb. 426, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 394 (Neb. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Boslaugh, J.

This case presents the same question as Wilson v. Ransom, post p. 427, 446 N.W.2d 6 (1989), which was decided today. For the reasons stated in Wilson v. Ransom, supra, the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to delete all provisions in the order of November 13, 1987, reciting that the order confirming registration of the Washington support order is a judgment in rem. In all other respects, the order confirming registration is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified, and cause REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boslaugh, J.

This case presents the same question as Wilson v. Ransom, post p. 427, 446 N.W.2d 6 (1989), which was decided today. For the reasons stated in Wilson v. Ransom, supra, the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to delete all provisions in the order of November 13, 1987, reciting that the order confirming registration of the Washington support order is a judgment in rem. In all other respects, the order confirming registration is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified, and cause REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 N.W.2d 889, 233 Neb. 426, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-hurst-neb-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack