Hurst v. Hurst
Opinion
Jann Kimberly HURST, n/k/a Jann Kimberly Papiernik, Appellant,
v.
Barry Lee HURST, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Steven P. Combs of Smith Green & Combs, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
A. Russell Smith, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of February 1, 2007, the Court has determined that because the Order Regarding Former Wife's Motion for Clarification merely reiterates provisions contained within the previously entered Consent Final Judgment, the order on appeal is not an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
973 So. 2d 1164 (Hurst v. Hurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.