Hurst v. Hurst
This text of 973 So. 2d 1164 (Hurst v. Hurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jann Kimberly HURST, n/k/a Jann Kimberly Papiernik, Appellant,
v.
Barry Lee HURST, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Steven P. Combs of Smith Green & Combs, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
A. Russell Smith, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of February 1, 2007, the Court has determined that because the Order Regarding Former Wife's Motion for Clarification merely reiterates provisions contained within the previously entered Consent Final Judgment, the order on appeal is not an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
973 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1518304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-hurst-fladistctapp-2007.