Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

418 So. 2d 444, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28894
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 25, 1982
DocketNo. AK-90
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 418 So. 2d 444 (Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurst v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 418 So. 2d 444, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28894 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss has been treated as a motion to strike appellee’s answer brief for failure to timely serve it. The action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission is affirmed. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

McCORD, MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lobo v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
433 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Woulard v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
426 So. 2d 66 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com'n
424 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 So. 2d 444, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurst-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1982.