Hursley v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Hursley v. Auditor General

1 McGrath 1038, 90 McGrath 439

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 4, 1892

DocketNo. 12139

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1038 (Hursley v. Auditor General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hursley v. Auditor General, 1 McGrath 1038, 90 McGrath 439 (Mich. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to pay relator’s bill for conveying to the Detroit House of Correction, a prisoner convicted under 3 How. Stat., Sec. 9286, of keeping a house of ill-fame and sentenced under How. Stat., Sec. 9864.

Granted March 4, 1892, with costs.

Held, that the fees or compensation of the sheriff for such services are state charges regardless of whether or not the county in which the conviction is had, has a contract with the said House of Correction, for the reception and retention of such persons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to pay relator’s bill for conveying to the Detroit House of Correction, a prisoner convicted under 3 How. Stat., Sec. 9286, of keeping a house of ill-fame and sentenced under How. Stat., Sec. 9864.

Granted March 4, 1892, with costs.

Held, that the fees or compensation of the sheriff for such services are state charges regardless of whether or not the county in which the conviction is had, has a contract with the said House of Correction, for the reception and retention of such persons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1038, 90 McGrath 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hursley-v-auditor-general-mich-1892.