Hursh v. Byers

29 Mo. 469
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Scott, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Story says, if a person comes upon a special contract to board and sojourn at an inn, he is not in the sense of the law a guest, but he is deemed a boarder. (§ 477.) The law gives the innkeeper a lien on the goods of a guest, not of a boarder. (§ 476.) The plaintiff having no lien on his boarder’s goods, he had no right to retain them; consequently there was no consideration for the promise made by the defendant to pay the board for which this suit is brought.

The other judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hursh v. Byers, 29 Mo. 469 (Mo. 1860).

29 Mo. 469 (Hursh v. Byers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Engert
453 S.W.2d 615 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1970)
Coates v. Acheson
23 Mo. App. 255 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Hancock v. . Rand
94 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Walther v. Merrell
6 Mo. App. 370 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1878)
Nichols v. Halliday
27 Wis. 406 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1871)