Hursh v. Asner

890 So. 2d 494, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20229, 2004 WL 3009047
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-3682
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 890 So. 2d 494 (Hursh v. Asner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hursh v. Asner, 890 So. 2d 494, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20229, 2004 WL 3009047 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Hursh appeals the trial court’s order denying her petition for a domestic violence injunction against her children’s father, Ronald Asner. While Hursh complains of several trial court errors, after carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court. Although the evidence was in significant conflict, Hursh had the ultimate burden of proof. Apparently, the trial court concluded she failed to prove her allegations.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMurry v. State
890 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 494, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20229, 2004 WL 3009047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hursh-v-asner-fladistctapp-2004.