Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co.
409 So. 2d 1214
Opinion
Since the jury charges actually given fully and fairly covered the subject matter of the plaintiff-appellant’s proposed special instruction, there was no harmful error, as he contends, in its denial. DeBold v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc., 368 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Lawler, 151 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). The other point raised similarly presents no basis for reversal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co., 409 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
409 So. 2d 1214 (Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Lawler
151 So. 2d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
DeBold v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc.
368 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)