Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co.

409 So. 2d 1214

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 1982

DocketNo. 80-1995

StatusPublished

This text of 409 So. 2d 1214 (Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. Steamship Co., 409 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since the jury charges actually given fully and fairly covered the subject matter of the plaintiff-appellant’s proposed special instruction, there was no harmful error, as he contends, in its denial. DeBold v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc., 368 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Lawler, 151 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). The other point raised similarly presents no basis for reversal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Since the jury charges actually given fully and fairly covered the subject matter of the plaintiff-appellant’s proposed special instruction, there was no harmful error, as he contends, in its denial. DeBold v. Ocean Reef Club, Inc., 368 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Lawler, 151 So.2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). The other point raised similarly presents no basis for reversal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 So. 2d 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurlston-v-lyres-bros-steamship-co-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack