Hurley v. West End Street Railway Co.

62 N.E. 263, 180 Mass. 370, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1085
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 62 N.E. 263 (Hurley v. West End Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurley v. West End Street Railway Co., 62 N.E. 263, 180 Mass. 370, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1085 (Mass. 1902).

Opinion

Lathrop, J.

On August 17,1897, at ten o’clock in the forenoon, the plaintiff, a man thirty-six years of age, was driving at a dog trot, in a light grocery delivery wagon, on A Street towards Fourth Street in South Boston. At the intersection of these streets one of the hind wheels of his wagon was struck by an electric street car, and the plaintiff was thrown on to the shafts, and was injured.

The only question before us is whether the judge who tried the case was right in ruling that the plaintiff was not in the exercise of due care, and in taking the case from the jury. We are of opinion that the judge was right. It is apparent from the plaintiff’s testimony that he knew that electric cars were running all the time on Fourth Street; that he did not look to see whether a car was coming or not; and that he knew nothing of the car until either it hit his wagon or was the distance of a rail away, and so right upon him. He testified both ways on [371]*371this point. The only excuse he offers is that he did not suspect the car was coming because he did not hear the gong sound.

It is apparent from the testimony of the plaintiff that he entirely failed to do for his safety what ordinarily careful persons are accustomed to do under like circumstances. Kelly v. Wakefield & Stoneham Street Railway, 175 Mass. 331.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitzpatrick v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
144 N.E. 75 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Connolly v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
236 Mass. 173 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Lynch v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
224 Mass. 93 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Capital Traction Co. v. Crump
35 App. D.C. 169 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1910)
McCormick v. Ottumwa Railway & Light Co.
124 N.W. 889 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1910)
Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.
105 P. 458 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Ginn v. Dolan
81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 121 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1909)
Birch v. Athol & Orange Street Railway Co.
84 N.E. 310 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Metropolitan Railway Co. v. Fonville
1907 OK 125 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)
Halloran v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.
78 N.E. 381 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Finnick v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.
77 N.E. 500 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Hennessey v. Taylor
76 N.E. 224 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Saltman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
72 N.E. 950 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Dunn v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.
71 N.E. 557 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Itzkowitz v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
71 N.E. 298 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Gleason v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.
68 N.E. 225 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.E. 263, 180 Mass. 370, 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-west-end-street-railway-co-mass-1902.