Hurley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hurley v. State

176 S.E. 897, 50 Ga. App. 92, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 633

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 2, 1934

Docket24290

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E. 897 (Hurley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurley v. State, 176 S.E. 897, 50 Ga. App. 92, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 633 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of burglary. The corpus delicti and the venue of the offense were proved, and there was evidence of certain incriminatory admissions, freely and voluntarily made by the accused, which virtually amounted to a confession of his guilt and authorized his conviction. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of burglary. The corpus delicti and the venue of the offense were proved, and there was evidence of certain incriminatory admissions, freely and voluntarily made by the accused, which virtually amounted to a confession of his guilt and authorized his conviction. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.E. 897, 50 Ga. App. 92, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-state-gactapp-1934.