Hurley v. Rose
191 N.E. 527, 264 N.Y. 484
Opinion
In each case, order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division; and question certified answered in the affirmative. (Datz v. Economy Cotton Goods Stores, Inc., 263 N. Y. 252.) No opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurley v. Rose, 191 N.E. 527, 264 N.Y. 484 (N.Y. 1934).
191 N.E. 527 (Hurley v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Dairy Products Co. v. Loft, Inc.
155 Misc. 771 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)