Hurley v. Rose

191 N.E. 527, 264 N.Y. 484
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 N.E. 527 (Hurley v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurley v. Rose, 191 N.E. 527, 264 N.Y. 484 (N.Y. 1934).

Opinion

In each case, order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division; and question certified answered in the affirmative. (Datz v. Economy Cotton Goods Stores, Inc., 263 N. Y. 252.) No opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Consolidated Dairy Products Co. v. Loft, Inc.
155 Misc. 771 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 N.E. 527, 264 N.Y. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-rose-ny-1934.