Hurley v. Perkins

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Hurley v. Perkins

337 N.E.2d 710, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 787, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 836

DecidedNovember 25, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 337 N.E.2d 710 (Hurley v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurley v. Perkins, 337 N.E.2d 710, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 787, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 836 (Mass. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

This case is before us on an appeal from a decree of a Probate Court which denied and dismissed a petition to vacate that part of a decree of divorce which awarded alimony to the plaintiff and provided for the sale of real estate and an equal division of the proceeds. That part of the decree was entered pursuant to a stipulation signed

The case was submitted on briefs. Joseph C. Hurley, executor, pro se. Gerald F. Lane for the defendant.

by the plaintiff and her husband. The stipulation was incorporated in the divorce decree by reference. The judge filed a report of material facts, and the evidence is reported. The judge found, contrary to the allegations of the petition, that the plaintiff had signed the stipulation with knowledge of its contents and after having conferred with her lawyer, and further that the agreement in the stipulation was fair. Those findings are supported by the evidence. Tsomides v. Tsomides, ante, 750 (1975).

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case is before us on an appeal from a decree of a Probate Court which denied and dismissed a petition to vacate that part of a decree of divorce which awarded alimony to the plaintiff and provided for the sale of real estate and an equal division of the proceeds. That part of the decree was entered pursuant to a stipulation signed

The case was submitted on briefs. Joseph C. Hurley, executor, pro se. Gerald F. Lane for the defendant.

by the plaintiff and her husband. The stipulation was incorporated in the divorce decree by reference. The judge filed a report of material facts, and the evidence is reported. The judge found, contrary to the allegations of the petition, that the plaintiff had signed the stipulation with knowledge of its contents and after having conferred with her lawyer, and further that the agreement in the stipulation was fair. Those findings are supported by the evidence. Tsomides v. Tsomides, ante, 750 (1975).

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

337 N.E.2d 710, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 787, 1975 Mass. App. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-perkins-massappct-1975.