Hurley v. Hurley
This text of 428 So. 2d 729 (Hurley v. Hurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final judgment in all respects except the issue of the wife’s attorney’s fees, which we conclude are properly chargeable to her. See Golden v. Golden, 410 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 419 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1982); Pepper v. Pepper, 388 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Pusey v. Pusey, 386 So.2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Bullard v. Bullard, 380 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
428 So. 2d 729, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-hurley-fladistctapp-1983.