Hurley v. Georgian Bay Lumber Co.
This text of 271 A.D.2d 810 (Hurley v. Georgian Bay Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Dowling and Harris, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to and against the weight of evidence and also that the court committed reversible error in excluding the proposed exhibit marked No. 7 for identification. (The judgment is for defendants for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-georgian-bay-lumber-co-nyappdiv-1946.