Hurley v. City of Trenton
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 350, 38 Vroom 350, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 115
This text of 51 A. 1109 (Hurley v. City of Trenton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurley v. City of Trenton, 51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 350, 38 Vroom 350, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 115 (N.J. 1902).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Fort. 37 Vroom 538.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 11
For reversal — Garretson, Vroom. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 A. 1109, 67 N.J.L. 350, 38 Vroom 350, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-city-of-trenton-nj-1902.