Hurley v. City of Niagara Falls
254 N.E.2d 917, 25 N.Y.2d 687, 306 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 949
This text of 254 N.E.2d 917 (Hurley v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurley v. City of Niagara Falls, 254 N.E.2d 917, 25 N.Y.2d 687, 306 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1969).
Opinions
Concur: Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion in which Chief Judge Fuld and Judge Bergan concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ho v. Rubin
756 A.2d 643 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1999)
Morgan & Bros. v. McGuire
114 Misc. 2d 951 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Campbell v. Cochran
416 A.2d 211 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
254 N.E.2d 917, 25 N.Y.2d 687, 306 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurley-v-city-of-niagara-falls-ny-1969.