Hurles v. Ryan
751 F.3d 1096, 2014 WL 1999321, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9104
This text of 751 F.3d 1096 (Hurles v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurles v. Ryan, 751 F.3d 1096, 2014 WL 1999321, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9104 (9th Cir. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
The warden’s Motion for Ruling on RespondenL-Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed February 1, 2013, is DENIED. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc with respect to the opinion filed together with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
751 F.3d 1096, 2014 WL 1999321, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurles-v-ryan-ca9-2014.