Hurlbut v. Cromwell

147 N.Y.S. 1035
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 1912·Published

Opinion

GREENBAUM, J.

The rights of an honorably discharged veteran of the volunteer navy of the United States during the Spanish War are analogous to those of a volunteer fireman and arise under section 22 of the Civil Service Law and not section 21, which applies to honor[1036]*1036ably discharged soldiers, sailors, or marines in the late Civil War. I am therefore constrained to hold, following Cottam v. City of N. Y., 74 Misc. Rep. 67, 131 N. Y. Supp. 617, that the petitioner may not properly claim a preference over other draftsmen in the borough president’s department by requiring their discharge because of lack of funds, so that he may thereby be retained in his position. The procedure that may be pursued by petitioner under section 22 of the Civil Service Law is outlined in Matter of Breckenridge, 160 N. Y. 103, 54 N. E. 670. The cases cited by the petitioner refer to veterans of the Civil War, who are expressly preferred by constitutional provision.

Motion for alternative writ of mandamus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurlbut v. Cromwell, 147 N.Y.S. 1035 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1912).

147 N.Y.S. 1035 (Hurlbut v. Cromwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breckenridge v. Scannell
54 N.E. 670 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Cottam v. City of New York
74 Misc. 67 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)