Hurlburt v. Reed

5 Mich. 30, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 5
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 11, 1858·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Manning J.:

The case of Loree vs. Reeves, 2 Mich. 133, we think is in point in this case. We have no doubt that, in a suit commenced by attachment against a non-resident, the Court may, in the exercise of a sound discretion, set aside the judgment, and permit the defendant to plead to the declaration, where he has had no notice of the proceeding against him in season to make his defense, and has been guilty of no laches.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurlburt v. Reed, 5 Mich. 30, 1858 Mich. LEXIS 5 (Mich. 1858).

5 Mich. 30 (Hurlburt v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partch v. Baird
199 N.W. 692 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Nealis v. Dicks
72 Ind. 374 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)