Hurlbert v. Norwald

477 S.W.3d 114, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 895, 2015 WL 5239573
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. No. ED 102320·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■This is a case involving a request for records by Appellant, Roger Hurlbert (“Hurlbert”)1 pursuant to the “Missouri Sunshine Law” (§§ 610.010 et seq., RSMo). Hurlbert appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his petition for permanent injunc-tive relief against Wendy Norwald, the custodian of records for the Warren County Assessor’s Office (“Assessor”), and the denial of his motion for leave to file amended petition.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurlbert v. Norwald, 477 S.W.3d 114, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 895, 2015 WL 5239573 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

477 S.W.3d 114 (Hurlbert v. Norwald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.