Hurlbert v. City of North Charleston

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6706

DONALD JAMES HURLBERT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; GLEN KRAMER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:09-cv-01084-HMH)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald James Hurlbert, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Sandra Jane Senn, SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald James Hurlbert appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hurlbert v. City of North Charleston, No. 9:09-cv-01084-

HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED