Hurdsman v. Viapath Technologies Inc

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION RODNEY A. HURDSMAN PLAINTIFF #2170782 VS. 4:22CV000227 JM-JJV VIAPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Formerly known as Globel Tel-Link; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending 1s Plaintiff's appeal of the Orders of Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe denying his motions for subpoenas duces tecum. (Docket #22). “The standard of review applicable to an appeal of a magistrate judge's order on a non-dispositive issue is extremely deferential.” Reko v. Creative Promotions, Inc., 70 F.Supp.2d 1005, 1007 (D.Minn.1999). The Court must affirm the order unless it is “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A). The Court agrees with the opinion of Judge Volpe and finds that it is neither erroneous nor contrary to the law. The orders of April 18 and May 3, 2022 are affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31* day of May, 2022.

James Kron United States District Judge