Hurdman v. Royal Development Co.
230 A.D. 787
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 230 A.D. 787 (Hurdman v. Royal Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurdman v. Royal Development Co., 230 A.D. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. (Graf v. Hope Building Corp., 254 N. Y. 1.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., dissents and vptes to reverse upon the ground that the conduct of the plaintiffs does not seem to be consistent with good conscience.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Graf v. Hope Building Corp.
171 N.E. 884 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurdman-v-royal-development-co-nyappdiv-1930.