Hurdle v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Hurdle v. Virginia

53 F. App'x 256

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2002·No. No. 02-2138·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin J. Hurdle appeals the district court’s order dismissing his racial discrimination complaint filed in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hurdle v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-01-259-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2002). We deny Hurdle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin J. Hurdle appeals the district court’s order dismissing his racial discrimination complaint filed in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hurdle v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-01-259-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2002). We deny Hurdle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hurdle v. Virginia, 53 F. App'x 256 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

53 F. App'x 256 (Hurdle v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related