Hurdle v. Virginia
This text of 53 F. App'x 256 (Hurdle v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kelvin J. Hurdle appeals the district court’s order dismissing his racial discrimination complaint filed in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hurdle v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-01-259-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 25, 2002). We deny Hurdle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F. App'x 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurdle-v-virginia-ca4-2002.