Hurdle v. Stockley

Superior Court of Delaware

Hurdle v. Stockley

11 Del. 447

Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 1, 1881·Published

Opinion

Thé Court, Comegys, C. J.,

after referring to Abbott’s Trial Evidence, chap 4, §§ 24, 25, and Adams on Ejectm., 282, said that it was the opinion of the court upon the evidence before them-that they ought to decline to instruct the jury to presume that the said Benjamin -Walls and his family of children living when he left the State for the west, are now all dead without issue; and that we must therefore grant the motion for a non-suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thé Court, Comegys, C. J.,

after referring to Abbott’s Trial Evidence, chap 4, §§ 24, 25, and Adams on Ejectm., 282, said that it was the opinion of the court upon the evidence before them-that they ought to decline to instruct the jury to presume that the said Benjamin -Walls and his family of children living when he left the State for the west, are now all dead without issue; and that we must therefore grant the motion for a non-suit.

Hurdle v. Stockley, 11 Del. 447 (Del. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

11 Del. 447 (Hurdle v. Stockley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.