Hurdle v. Sears Roebuck & Co
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-60321 Summary Calendar
PERRIN W. HURDLE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi (1:95-CV-247-BrR) July 2, 1998
Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM*:
This matter is before the Court on remand from the Supreme
Court.
IT IS ORDERED that this matter is hereby remanded to the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States District Court for the Southern District of
Mississippi for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion
of the Supreme Court in Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 118 S.
Ct. 838 (1998).
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurdle v. Sears Roebuck & Co (Hurdle v. Sears Roebuck & Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.