Hurdle v. Commonwealth of VA

13 F. App'x 197
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 16, 2001·No. 01-1053·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*198 PER CURIAM.

Kelvin J. Hurdle seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment against him on his Title VII claims. See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion, and the materials submitted by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hurdle v. Virginia, No. CA-00-836 (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2001). We deny Hurdle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurdle v. Commonwealth of VA, 13 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2001).

13 F. App'x 197 (Hurdle v. Commonwealth of VA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurdle v. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
227 F. Supp. 2d 549 (E.D. Virginia, 2002)