Hurd v. Williams

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Hurd v. Williams

12 F. Cas. 1009, 4 McLean 239

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

DecidedJune 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 12 F. Cas. 1009 (Hurd v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurd v. Williams, 12 F. Cas. 1009, 4 McLean 239 (circtdmi 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT. A motion was made at the last term in this case, to set aside a sale on execution. The motion was not continued, and the defendants’ counsel objects to taking it up, on that ground. The court directed a continuance to be entered nunc pro tunc, but held that the defendants’ counsel was not bound to take up the cause at the present term, as the motion was not continued regularly from the last term. The defendants’ counsel had a right to suppose, as the motion was not continued, it had been abandoned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT. A motion was made at the last term in this case, to set aside a sale on execution. The motion was not continued, and the defendants’ counsel objects to taking it up, on that ground. The court directed a continuance to be entered nunc pro tunc, but held that the defendants’ counsel was not bound to take up the cause at the present term, as the motion was not continued regularly from the last term. The defendants’ counsel had a right to suppose, as the motion was not continued, it had been abandoned.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 F. Cas. 1009, 4 McLean 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurd-v-williams-circtdmi-1847.