Hurd v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hurd v. Taylor

87 N.Y.S. 1137

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the question of the illegality of the contract was properly submitted to the jury.

McLennan, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent. upon the ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the agreement under which the plaintiff seeks to recover was a wager contract, and was understood by the parties to he such, and that therefore the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the question of the illegality of the contract was properly submitted to the jury.

McLennan, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent. upon the ground that the evidence conclusively establishes that the agreement under which the plaintiff seeks to recover was a wager contract, and was understood by the parties to he such, and that therefore the plaintiff is not entitled to recover.

Hurd v. Taylor, 87 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

87 N.Y.S. 1137 (Hurd v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.