Hurd v. Stone

Michigan Superior Court, Detroit

Hurd v. Stone

1 How. N.P. 1

DecidedJanuary 22, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 1 (Hurd v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Superior Court, Detroit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurd v. Stone, 1 How. N.P. 1 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court,

Chipman, J.,

denied the motion, and held that filing the affidavit and issuing the writ of garnishment at the time of filing the declaration and entering the rule to plead, was a compliance with the statute. The Court based its opinion upon the universal practice in the profession, rather than upon the strict construction of the statute, but did not intimate that a strict construction of the statute would have caused it to hold the other way.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court,

Chipman, J.,

denied the motion, and held that filing the affidavit and issuing the writ of garnishment at the time of filing the declaration and entering the rule to plead, was a compliance with the statute. The Court based its opinion upon the universal practice in the profession, rather than upon the strict construction of the statute, but did not intimate that a strict construction of the statute would have caused it to hold the other way.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. N.P. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurd-v-stone-michsuperctdetr-1882.