Hurd v. NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL INSULATION

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hurd v. NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL INSULATION

771 N.W.2d 513, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 592, 2009 WL 2781526

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided August 28, 2009·No. A09-765·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 10, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 10, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Hurd v. NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL INSULATION, 771 N.W.2d 513, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 592, 2009 WL 2781526 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

771 N.W.2d 513 (Hurd v. NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL INSULATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related