Hurd v. Hurd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hurd v. Hurd

349 So. 2d 782

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 1977·No. No. EE-13·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without holding that appellee is forever entitled to continue receiving alimony from appellant, we do find and determine from the record in this case that the learned trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he failed to further reduce or eliminate alimony based upon a totality of the circumstances revealed by the evidence as of the date of the hearing which gave rise to the order here appealed.

Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees incident to this appeal is denied and the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Without holding that appellee is forever entitled to continue receiving alimony from appellant, we do find and determine from the record in this case that the learned trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he failed to further reduce or eliminate alimony based upon a totality of the circumstances revealed by the evidence as of the date of the hearing which gave rise to the order here appealed.

Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees incident to this appeal is denied and the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Hurd v. Hurd, 349 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

349 So. 2d 782 (Hurd v. Hurd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related