Hurd v. Hurd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hurd v. Hurd

349 So. 2d 782

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 2, 1977

DocketNo. EE-13

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 So. 2d 782 (Hurd v. Hurd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurd v. Hurd, 349 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without holding that appellee is forever entitled to continue receiving alimony from appellant, we do find and determine from the record in this case that the learned trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he failed to further reduce or eliminate alimony based upon a totality of the circumstances revealed by the evidence as of the date of the hearing which gave rise to the order here appealed.

Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees incident to this appeal is denied and the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Without holding that appellee is forever entitled to continue receiving alimony from appellant, we do find and determine from the record in this case that the learned trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he failed to further reduce or eliminate alimony based upon a totality of the circumstances revealed by the evidence as of the date of the hearing which gave rise to the order here appealed.

Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees incident to this appeal is denied and the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 So. 2d 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurd-v-hurd-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack