Hurd v. Hull
1 Root 505
Opinion
The statute is express and positive that no writ shall be valid, etc. unless the duty is paid and certified; and the agreement of the parties cannot alter the law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurd v. Hull, 1 Root 505 (Colo. 1793).
1 Root 505 (Hurd v. Hull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
"Harris Millinery Supply" v. Harris Gans
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 434 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1936)
Harris v. Harris & Gans Co.
3 Conn. Supp. 434 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Morse v. Rankin
51 Conn. 326 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1883)