Hurd v. Hull
1 Root 505
This text of 1 Root 505 (Hurd v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurd v. Hull, 1 Root 505 (Colo. 1793).
Opinion
The statute is express and positive that no writ shall be valid, etc. unless the duty is paid and certified; and the agreement of the parties cannot alter the law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
"Harris Millinery Supply" v. Harris Gans
3 Conn. Super. Ct. 434 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1936)
Harris v. Harris & Gans Co.
3 Conn. Supp. 434 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Morse v. Rankin
51 Conn. 326 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurd-v-hull-conn-1793.