Hurd v. Hall
1 Root 372
This text of 1 Root 372 (Hurd v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hurd v. Hall, 1 Root 372 (Colo. 1792).
Opinion
Judgment — That tbe declaration is sufficient. Tbe averment is direct and positive that tbe defendant was indebted for money bad and received for tbe plaintiff’s use, wbicb is all tbat was necessary. See Lawrence v. Clark, New Haven tbis circuit, and tbe plaintiff’s mentioning of whom tbe money was received is for tbe defendant’s advantage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurd-v-hall-conn-1792.