Hurd v. City of Troy

54 So. 495, 170 Ala. 113, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 31
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 9, 1911·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

The transcript contains copies of the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the writ, the return, and a history of what occurred upon [114] a. hearing of the writ set forth in a paper which states that it was presented to and signed by the judge as a bill of exceptions, though it shows no exception reserved to any ruling made in the premises. It contains no certificate of appeal, as the statute (Code 1907, § 6245) requires. It fails, therefore, to connect the petitioner with the presence in this court of the transcript.—Ex parte Rutledge, 118 Ala. 651, 24 South. 1004.

The cause is therefore stricken from the docket.

Dowdeld, C. J., and Anderson and Somerville, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurd v. City of Troy, 54 So. 495, 170 Ala. 113, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 31 (Ala. 1911).

54 So. 495 (Hurd v. City of Troy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Summers v. State
15 So. 2d 500 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1943)
Glenn v. Glenn
106 So. 226 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
State v. Carter
60 So. 941 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)